Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
Student Housing in Greater Austin

Student Housing in Austin, TX

Compare 76 student housing options in Austin, TX. What to look for in a lease, typical costs, and how our scoring ranks the best complexes.

Student housing in Austin covers apartments, condos, and purpose-built complexes marketed to college students, most of them within a short drive or bus ride of the University of Texas campus and the surrounding West Campus and Riverside corridors. This category includes 76 businesses, ranging from large complexes with resort-style pools and study lounges to smaller, no-frills buildings where the main selling point is a cheap rent and a short walk to class.

The service itself usually means more than just a unit to rent. Most student-focused properties lease by the bed rather than by the unit, so roommates sign individual contracts and each person is only on the hook for their own room. Many also bundle in furniture, utilities, and internet, and some run shuttle service to campus during the school year. That bundling is convenient, but it also makes prices harder to compare property to property unless you break the total cost down into rent plus fees plus utilities.

What to check before you sign

  • Real walking or shuttle time to campus, not just the distance shown on a map, especially during early morning classes or Texas summer heat.
  • What is actually included in the advertised rent: utilities, internet, parking, and whether furniture is optional or required (and priced separately).
  • Lease terms and turnover: most Austin student leases run August to July regardless of the academic calendar, so ask about summer sublease rules and move-out timing.
  • Security, maintenance response time, and noise policy, since these vary a lot between complexes built for students versus general renters.
  • Parking availability and cost, which is a real constraint near UT and can add a meaningful amount to monthly cost.

Our scoring weighs verified reviews, responsiveness, and consistency of service over time, so you can compare properties on more than just glossy photos and move-in specials. For a ranked shortlist of the top-rated complexes in the city, see our best apartment complexes in Austin, TX guide. Details on how we calculate those rankings are on our methodology page.

Check availability for student housing in Austin, TX

No cost and no obligation. Share a few details and we'll connect you with a good fit.

Check availability

All student housing in Austin, TX, ranked by score and relevance

75 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is student housing, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Texan 26
#1
62

Texan 26

3.7(104)✓ Google-verified

Staff and maintenance earn consistent praise for their friendliness, speed, and willingness to tackle repairs that other complexes would dismiss. Patrick, Taylor, Jaia, Damaris, Ruben, and other named team members are repeatedly cited for going beyond standard fixes, replacing appliances rather than patching them, and treating residents like family. Community events have improved morale. However, persistent issues undercut the experience: frat noise reaches eardrum-damaging levels even on weeknights, parking passes have been towed despite residents being registered and warned in advance, and elevator outages leave tenants stranded. For some residents, management responsiveness appears to vary by tenure or time period. The building shows age, and repair timelines swing from same-day to weeks, making reliability a gamble. The 3.7 rating across 104 reviews reflects this split. Residents who experience the engaged management and quick maintenance tier leave glowing recommendations and renew leases. Those caught in noise conflicts, towing disputes, or maintenance gaps feel blindsided and regret moving in. The property's location near campus and affordability relative to newer West Campus towers are genuine draws, but they do not insulate against the noise and parking friction that plague some tenants.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Davies Ranch
#2
79

Davies Ranch

4.3(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most reviewers describe a clean, well-kept community where maintenance responds quickly and the leasing team builds genuine relationships. Units have granite countertops, stainless steel appliances, and spacious layouts with reliable heating and cooling. Pet owners appreciate dedicated dog wash stations, poop bag supplies, and staff who enforce regular waste removal. A small number of visitors encountered dismissive pricing conversations and felt unwelcome by certain staff members during tours, though these incidents appear isolated. The property offers fiber internet, car wash stations, recycling, and regular resident events. Reviewers note plentiful parking, quiet units with tolerable soundproofing, and maintenance staff like Franklin and Franklyn who solve problems within hours without formal tickets. One long-term resident reported rent decreases during their tenure and fair move-out accounting. The gated community appeals to those prioritizing security and a park-like setting.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Marquis at Great Hills
#3
76

Marquis at Great Hills

4.1(286)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the quiet, tree-filled setting and responsive staff who handle maintenance requests within hours. The complex sits near major retailers, restaurants, and Gateway Shopping Center, with standout amenities including a resort-style pool, gym, parking garage, and car wash station. Longtime tenants report strong relationships with management, particularly naming staff members Diana and Will at the leasing office and Antonio on maintenance. Most cite convenient access to downtown (roughly 15 minutes) and appreciate the blend of urban proximity and community feel. A few mention pricing could be more competitive, though most balance cost against the location and service quality.

Student Housing
Marquis at Treetops
#4
73

Marquis at Treetops

4.4(177)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence masks systemic problems. Nick and Adrean lead a maintenance team that residents consistently praise for speed, warmth, and genuine care. The hilltop location, wildlife, quiet grounds, and views draw people in. But corporate (CWS Apartments) ignores safety complaints: dangerous traffic flow at the entrance gate, extreme lighting that violates Austin code, and a dumpster left near units for weeks. Move-out fees for minor items and poor-quality finishes compound frustration. Residents report months of unanswered calls to corporate and a powerless on-site team. The 1-star reviews detail civil negligence concerns and plead for others to avoid the property. This is a place with exceptional staff doing their best against management indifference.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Bridge at Windsor Park
#5
79

Bridge at Windsor Park

4.7(264)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Bridge at Windsor Park holds a 4.7 rating across 264 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments

Check availability for student housing in Austin, TX

No cost and no obligation. Share a few details and we'll connect you with a good fit.

Check availability
Tramor at the Hills
#6
79

Tramor at the Hills

4.7(85)✓ Google-verified

Staff treat long-term residents as people, not transactions. Bailey and Katy are named repeatedly for going out of their way; maintenance fixes AC issues within 30 minutes and handles work orders same-day. The wooded setting and proximity to the Arboretum shopping center draw comparisons to an oasis rather than typical corporate housing. Plumbing and AC struggle in older units, and a few residents experienced communication gaps around lease renewals and pricing inquiries. The community works for those seeking personality over polish: quieter than downtown complexes, dog-friendly with an off-leash park, and strong enough maintenance care that long-term residents renew repeatedly. Units vary (some newly renovated with vaulted ceilings; loft styles with skylights are popular), and the address near three highway corridors means reaching anywhere Austin without the apartment-park feel.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Parmer Place Apartments
#7
71

Parmer Place Apartments

4.2(303)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Geovanni, Chante, and Diana earn strong praise for attentiveness and quick repairs, and most recent reviews celebrate the community. However, a detailed move-in account reveals serious gaps: apartments arrived unclean (cat urine odors persisting months later, paint overspray, debris), maintenance requests required repeated follow-ups to complete, and grounds upkeep lags badly (dead wildlife left for months, empty pet waste bins, ant mounds, hornet nests, trash). New residents should inspect thoroughly and document on arrival.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Royce at 8100
#8
81

The Royce at 8100

4.5(441)✓ Google-verified

Moving in here typically feels welcoming. Office staff including Sarah, Hannah and Faith guide you through leasing quickly. Amenities like the gym, pool, and dog park draw regular praise. Maintenance staff including Mike respond promptly to requests. The community hosts monthly events and residents report feeling safe in the gated setting. However, departing residents flag serious concerns. Security deposit deductions for carpet and light bulbs have been contested as excessive and poorly justified. Lease buyout clauses match longer terms even on short leases, which caught some off-guard during hardship. A small number report AC noise outside bedrooms and periodic neighbor disturbances. Staff has reportedly dismissed deposit disputes as final.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marquis at Caprock Canyon
#9
68

Marquis at Caprock Canyon

4.1(135)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the quiet neighborhood atmosphere, attentive maintenance crew, and wildlife views, with most reporting smooth day-to-day living. However, move-out billing practices and management's handling of significant problems like AC failures and rodent issues have frustrated departing residents, who report inflated fees and little flexibility on lease terms. Strengths lie in the maintenance team's speed and the nature preserve setting with walking trails and pool amenities. Concerns center on aging interiors, security lapses at entry gates, and a pattern of costly surprise charges that residents feel are poorly justified or inconsistently applied to new versus existing tenants.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Ironhorse Flats
#10
75

Ironhorse Flats

4.2(294)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the staff's friendliness and quick response times to maintenance and questions. Management teams like Martha, Nina, Raciel, Vento, and Ruzlan are named repeatedly for going above and beyond. The property is clean and well-kept. However, two recent reviews describe aggressive towing of guest vehicles at $300+ with inadequate signage, and describe the office as unhelpful when challenged. The community appeals to renters seeking a personal, welcoming environment. Move-in was smooth for most, with one reviewer noting the A/C was fixed in days. Pricing ranges from $850 to $1,300 monthly, and amenities include a fitness center, pool, and bark park. The towing issue appears isolated to guest parking but has damaged trust among at least two visitors.

Student HousingTownhome & Garden-Style CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Esperanza Domain
#11
75

Esperanza Domain

4.2(242)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and move-in visitors consistently praise staff warmth and maintenance responsiveness, particularly team members Alex, Kaitlyn, and Alix. The location near Domain shopping and downtown Austin appeals to renters valuing walkability. However, a split emerged around management style after a leadership change. Recent complaints cite parking garage break-ins, aggressive towing enforcement, and dismissive responses to building security and access problems. The smart-home entry system has left some locked out. For those unbothered by these operational friction points, the community offers strong day-to-day support.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Woodstone
#12
75

Woodstone

4.3(121)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and first-time renters consistently praise Woodstone's quiet setting and staff warmth, particularly Elizabeth and maintenance workers like Rodney and Christian who respond quickly and go above and beyond. However, some critical repairs linger for months (AC units, water heater problems, exterior damage), and shared spaces like the laundry room go uncleaned; noise complaints suggest management struggles to enforce quiet standards despite trying. The complex appeals to student renters and pet owners seeking a calm neighborhood near schools, but expect occasional hiccups with office accessibility and be prepared that building age shows. Staff names surface repeatedly as the real draw here.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Cricket Hollow Apartments
#13
68

Cricket Hollow Apartments

4.0(273)✓ Google-verified

Cricket Hollow delivers solid value and responsive management when things go right, with named staff like Jessica and Aries earning praise for quick action and attentiveness. The property itself is clean and well-kept, but complaints about weekend noise, pest control failures, maintenance communication barriers, and utility problems cut through the positive reviews and suggest service inconsistency is a real issue.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
DK Riata
#14
74

DK Riata

4.4(239)✓ Google-verified

A polarized complex where responsive staff and quick maintenance wins loyalty from many residents, but aging buildings and opaque billing practices frustrate others enough to warn new renters. Walter and Corinne stand out for hands-on support, amenities work well, and the gated North Austin location appeals to families and pet owners. However, thin walls, outdated units, and management's pattern of recalculating charges or misrepresenting fees after move-out leave departing tenants with deposit disputes and debt collection calls. Noise carries between units and through gutters on rainy nights; pest control is effective but inconsistent. The gap between five-star and one-star reviews appears real: satisfied residents praise community upkeep and staff care, while those burned by fees or maintenance gaps view the high rating as misleading. Lease terms and fee structures need close reading before signing.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Bexley at Tech Ridge Apartments
#15
77

Bexley at Tech Ridge Apartments

4.0(214)✓ Google-verified

Beto Arellano's maintenance work dominates recent feedback, with residents praising his speed, skill, and willingness to solve problems from broken ACs to dryers and appliances. The building and grounds are well kept, staff are approachable, and emergency calls get quick attention even late at night. Amenities include fitness, pool, dog park, and pet spa. Location near Tech Ridge appeals to students and working professionals. Limited detail on pricing or unit finishes, but the strong maintenance reputation and responsive support stand out.

Student HousingAffordable & Section 8 HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Nova North Apartments
#16
74

Nova North Apartments

4.3(198)✓ Google-verified

Management and maintenance staff earn consistent praise for speed and helpfulness, with some residents reporting 13-year tenures and strong office support. Noise control remains a friction point; several residents report that complaints about loud neighbors go unresolved, with management suggesting tenants move rather than enforce community standards.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Nolina Flats
#17
75

Nolina Flats

4.2(190)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently highlight the team's warmth and maintenance speed, with many praising how the property feels like home. Several note the quiet setting on 620, plentiful parking, and well-kept common areas. However, a small but vocal group report delayed responses to maintenance (one patio leak left unresolved for six months), selective vehicle towing, gate security lapses, and disputes over lease-break charges and deposit returns that stretched months.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Stonelake at the Arboretum
#18
73

Stonelake at the Arboretum

4.3(319)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff like Daniel and Yvonne deliver warm, attentive service during leasing and move-in. Many residents praise quick maintenance response and a clean, peaceful setting near shops and restaurants. However, significant concerns surface: residents report unaddressed black mold, broken gates for months, filthy hallways, and unsettling behavior from maintenance workers that discourages reporting issues. High rents paired with aging buildings and security lapses leave some feeling the value has slipped. Management's record is uneven. Alfredo and Yvonne demonstrate genuine care, but reports of discriminatory staff conduct, slow action on serious defects, and a property manager (Kate) deemed unfit by at least one long-term tenant suggest inconsistency at the leadership level. For those prioritizing location and staff warmth, it works; for those needing reassurance about safety, upkeep, or affordability, proceed with caution.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Marquis at Ladera Vista
#19
75

Marquis at Ladera Vista

4.3(108)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report a peaceful, well-run community where maintenance responds quickly and staff remembers their names. The grounds feel private despite proximity to U.S. 183, with mature trees and walking trails where residents spot deer and wildlife. Several longtime tenants renewed leases and chose to stay longer than planned. However, two significant complaints temper this picture. One recent resident dealt with widespread fire ants and alleged poor management response; another felt misled about washer/dryer inclusions and uneven flooring in a unit marketed as renovated. A handful mention rising rents yearly and mention summer heat and winter cold penetrating units, contradicting the prevailing praise for quiet, well-insulated living spaces.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
The Vaughan
#20
72

The Vaughan

4.2(89)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the apartments' modern finishes, peaceful setting, and standout amenities, particularly the pool. Staff members Bryan and Nick earn consistent recognition for attentive service and quick responses during leasing. However, a substantial minority report parking gridlock that forces paid upgrades, delayed pest control despite ongoing infestations, and excessive move-out charges deducted from deposits. Construction quality concerns (thin walls, settling flooring, ceiling cracks) and slow management replies to maintenance issues emerge in longer-term resident accounts.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
MAA Canyon Creek
#21
73

MAA Canyon Creek

4.1(266)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Manuel and the maintenance crew consistently impress residents with same-day HVAC responses and genuine professionalism. The property itself is quiet and mature, with office staff like Will and Gisela earning praise for attentiveness. Move-in inspections fall short, though, and appliance repairs stall weeks while office availability shrinks. Long-term residents report steep rent hikes that outpace new-lease pricing, which some see as poor loyalty reward. Management coordinates well during emergencies and keeps common areas clean and peaceful. Day-to-day issues get solved fast by a capable team. The frustration here stems from low staffing and pricing practices, not from the people trying their best within those constraints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Marquis at Brushy Creek
#22
74

The Marquis at Brushy Creek

4.1(297)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the community's cleanliness, greenery, and staff warmth. Juli, Angelica, Lacey, and maintenance team members like Rolando earn consistent recognition for going beyond their roles. Leasing and move-in processes run smooth. However, two residents report serious problems: management ignored repeated security breaches (car windows broken three times, garage broken into twice), did not answer phones, and left them feeling unprotected. These accounts describe a pattern of unresponsiveness to safety concerns and frustration over unexplained fees. The gap between these experiences is stark. Long-term residents describe a peaceful place with responsive maintenance and kind staff. Those with security issues felt abandoned by management. Families seem satisfied; those who experienced safety lapses felt disrespected and unsafe.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Section 8 Housing
Waters at Willow Run
#23
73

Waters at Willow Run

4.0(243)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the leasing and maintenance teams, particularly Gael and Alma, for attentive, patient service that simplifies the move-in process. The community feels safe and quiet, with active upkeep and no reported package theft or vagrancy. However, applicants face substantial waitlists (300+ in queue at times) and struggle with an outdated AI chatbot, a website that permits booking when offices are closed, and staff who sometimes seem unprepared for walk-in visits. Service quality drops sharply at the front desk for prospective tenants.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bellrock La Frontera
#24
71

Bellrock La Frontera

4.2(237)✓ Google-verified

Since new management took over, Bellrock La Frontera has made visible improvements: power washing, new grills, fresh TVs in the office, and staff like Kilish and Sabrina earning consistent praise for friendliness and care. Apartments are spacious, clean, and well-positioned near shopping and restaurants, with strong amenities including pools and dog parks. However, tension runs through resident feedback. Maintenance requests languish for weeks, pest control ignores follow-ups, and parking disputes escalate to unlawful tows. One resident's roof leak in May became a uninhabitable nightmare: debris in the kitchen, a brutal temporary move, and only $125 compensation. Staff communication often fails until residents escalate by phone or public complaint.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Bridge at Harris Ridge
#25
69

The Bridge at Harris Ridge

3.5(175)✓ Google-verified

Recent reviews emphasize strong customer service from named staff members Carolina Mondragón and Taeya, who are repeatedly credited with easing the leasing and application process. Maintenance responds quickly to repair requests like AC issues, and the office team consistently addresses resident concerns with professionalism and flexibility. The shift toward positive reviews appears recent, with staff improvements noted as driving higher satisfaction.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
Ten Oaks
#26
68

Ten Oaks

4.1(263)✓ Google-verified

Ten Oaks delivers strong first impressions and solid grounds maintenance, with leasing staff and property management earning repeated praise for responsiveness and care. The experience sours for some residents post-move-in: maintenance delays stretch weeks or months, pest problems persist despite baits, and inconsistent enforcement of parking rules has led to surprise tows. Deposit disputes and amenity outages add to the friction, and high manager turnover leaves residents uncertain who to trust with serious problems.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Windsor Republic Place Apartments
#27
70

Windsor Republic Place Apartments

4.2(199)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents love the speed of maintenance (often one hour) and the personal touches from named staff members like Ashley and Terah who go above and beyond. The grounds feel secure and calm, and amenities are clean and well-kept. However, the community struggles with leasing office responsiveness and a pattern of plumbing, appliance, and soundproofing issues that frustrate newcomers, some waiting weeks for fixes. The move-in experience is often messy: delayed keys, missing parking stickers, and unprepared fobs appear in multiple reviews. Long-term renewing tenants report being priced out when their leases come up (charged $1,600 while new residents pay $1,400 for the same unit), creating resentment. Despite the marketing hype around resident satisfaction awards, the reality for many feels like a disconnect between management promises and day-to-day execution.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Madison Northridge
#28
68

Madison Northridge

4.0(243)✓ Google-verified

Staff earn consistent praise for speed and warmth, particularly Renee and Martin in leasing and maintenance. The location near The Domain and local parks appeals to many. But numerous long-term residents report disconnect between listing photos and actual unit quality, plus recurring AC failures, incomplete repairs, and bathroom issues that maintenance patches over without addressing root causes. The property works well for short-stay newcomers but friction builds for those staying longer. Rent runs around $1,200 per month for one-bedroom units. Reviewers note responsive management and a safe feel, though non-gated grounds mean occasional package theft. The pool and outdoor spaces draw praise from some, yet maintenance backlog appears chronic, leaving residents frustrated when the same problems cycle every few months.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
AMLI Lakeline
#29
70

AMLI Lakeline

4.1(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and units themselves are stylish with solid amenities. Management's failure to enforce lease rules on noise and smoking creates frustration for tenants who document problems for months without resolution. Move-out fees draw complaints, and some residents report missing packages with limited recourse.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Abelia Flats
#30
70

Abelia Flats

4.1(200)✓ Google-verified

Abelia draws praise for responsive maintenance, welcoming front desk staff, and rates that undercut local competition, especially for newcomers to Austin. However, recurring complaints center on pest control lapses, loose enforcement of move-out charges that tenants dispute, and uneven management attentiveness to common area upkeep.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Windsor Ridge Apartments
#31
68

Windsor Ridge Apartments

4.0(201)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team for quick, thorough work and staff like Hannah, Carlos, and Chris for their responsiveness and care. However, recent reviews expose serious lapses: a roach infestation discovered at lease start, management's refusal to cover displaced residents' emergency costs, and several multi-month maintenance failures including window leaks and water damage. Security concerns, overbilling disputes, and hostile lease termination agreements suggest operational inconsistency between field staff and executive decision-making. The leasing office delivers poor initial experiences-rudeness, missing information, appointments given to others. Those who get past this stage and stay benefit from reliable maintenance and clean common areas, but tenants with complex issues describe management as evasive, unsympathetic, and unresponsive to follow-up. One long-term tenant's shift from "absolutely love it" to frustration after six years signals recent deterioration in management quality.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Griffis at The Domain
#32
67

Griffis at The Domain

4.0(592)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Griffis at The Domain earns praise for helpful staff like Kelsey and quick maintenance responses from Derrick and Ally, but residents consistently report hidden fees adding roughly $300 monthly, thin soundproofing, poor advance notice on construction, and broken gym equipment that stays broken. Experience varies sharply by staff member and department.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
MAA Balcones Woods
#33
60

MAA Balcones Woods

3.5(263)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff at the leasing office-especially Tila Newbery and Kayla Gordon-earn consistent praise for patience, warmth, and clear communication during the application and move-in process. Residents describe a genuine sense of community and fast maintenance turnaround. However, a meaningful share report serious gaps: poor follow-up communication that leads to late fees, maintenance requests that languish (water damage, roach infestations, structural repairs), and missing gym facilities. The experience appears sharply split between smooth initial entry and ongoing operational friction. Lawn service disturbances, noise from the pool, and package theft round out regular complaints. Those praising the property often mention long tenure and emotional attachment; those with the worst experiences cite documented maintenance failures and unresponsive management that escalated into legal disputes.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Starburst Apartments
#34
66

Starburst Apartments

3.9(651)✓ Google-verified

Starburst earns strong praise for its leasing and management team, especially staff members Yolizz and Gabriella who handle applications and resident concerns with patience and care. However, quality of life is seriously compromised by neighbor noise, insufficient parking, ongoing pest issues including a resident keeping a rooster and chickens, and weak enforcement of community rules.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Fivetwo at Highland
#35
73

Fivetwo at Highland

4.3(522)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff Luis and Sophia earn consistent praise for attentive, personable service that cuts through move-in stress. The Highland location near ACC serves students and commuters well, and the units deliver spacious layouts with natural light. The property itself appears modern and well-designed. But the community struggles with slow maintenance, where repairs often take 2-3 weeks or go incomplete, and an expanding fee structure that leaves residents frustrated. Parking garage changes have displaced lower-floor residents far from their homes. Several reviews document broken door locks, security gaps, and vehicle break-ins despite the gated design. A disabled resident noted the new parking policy creates accessibility barriers.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Terrazzo
#36
59

Terrazzo

3.2(229)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews highlight friendly staff, quick maintenance, and spacious layouts near major Austin amenities. One-star accounts detail months of ignored work orders, broken doors left unrepaired, AC and window issues requiring weeks to address, and management fining residents while ignoring unit defects. The split reflects genuine inconsistency: some tenants experience prompt service, while others report systematic neglect and feel trapped by lease penalties. The leasing team earned separate criticism for ignoring scheduled tours. Reviewers also report online rent quotes omit garbage, management, and pool fees that push actual costs well above advertised rates. Photos appear not to match move-in condition, and one tenant describes lingering odors from previous occupants not being cleaned. A named staff member, Joshua, won individual praise for leasing support and follow-up responsiveness.

Student Housing
Allegre Point Apartments
#37
67

Allegre Point Apartments

4.1(109)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Allegre Point draws strong praise for attentive leasing staff (LaTanya, Arlene, Hermes) and responsive maintenance, with residents enjoying a quiet, gated community and regular events. New move-ins report welcome gifts and personalized tours. However, longer-term residents cite chronic roach problems, package theft, and management slowness on serious complaints, with one resident noting a marked decline over their three-year stay; another reported a week of silence on a credit reporting error. The divide appears tied to tenure and staff consistency. High satisfaction centers on the leasing and maintenance experience; dissatisfaction emerges from pest control lapses and management accountability on complex issues. Gated grounds and community amenities (dog park, pool, Starbucks cafe, pantry) are genuine draws, but pest control and theft require honest investigation before commit.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingLuxury ApartmentsStudent Housing

Check availability for student housing in Austin, TX

No cost and no obligation. Share a few details and we'll connect you with a good fit.

Check availability
Sabina
#38
72

Sabina

3.9(218)✓ Google-verified

Sabina offers clean, well-maintained apartments with strong staff engagement and frequent resident events. Most residents praise the leasing and maintenance teams' responsiveness and friendliness. However, recent elevator issues and one well-documented leasing agent encounter involving pricing confusion and unit availability misinformation created friction for prospective residents. The community regularly hosts vendor events (especially with Pivot Partners catering), which reviewers consistently highlight as a draw. Location near UT Austin and downtown is a plus for student and young professional tenants. Staff like Brenda, Ellie, and the front desk team earn specific praise for patience and attention to detail.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
Oak Park Apartments
#39
72

Oak Park Apartments

4.1(131)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise maintenance crews for lightning-fast repairs and genuine friendliness. Alex, Cory, and Roberto fix problems same-day or within 72 hours; staff like Texie in the office take concerns seriously. The trade-off: it's an older complex, and security is a real problem. Bike and car theft happen regularly with no guard or cameras, management won't fund them, and transients roam the property. One tenant with an 8-year lease calls it a bargain for square footage near campus, despite persistent weed smell and aging infrastructure.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Altair Tech Ridge
#40
65

Altair Tech Ridge

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviewers praise staff by name (Jurnee, Blanca, Bailey) for friendliness during tours and leasing, and describe the grounds as clean, quiet, and well-maintained with good amenities. However, a stream of one- and two-star reviews detail significant operational gaps: broken grills and pool chemistry mishaps, a non-Tesla EV charger that management wouldn't troubleshoot, only 18 visitor spots for 300 units with aggressive towing, and move-in units left with dog hair and cigarette butts. Residents report communication drops after signing the lease, and several discovered undisclosed fees or unexplained conditional approvals. The tension here is stark. Long-term residents who stayed years consistently credit the maintenance team and describe a peaceful community they'd return to. Yet newer residents document deteriorating conditions: dirty hallways, unresponsive EV support, and gate access chaos that suggests operational breakdown at scale.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Silver Springs Apartments
#41
58

Silver Springs Apartments

2.9(185)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

New management has brought visible improvements to grounds and responsiveness, with leasing staff and office team drawing repeated praise for attentiveness and friendliness. However, persistent complaints about pest infestations, unresolved car break-ins, a security guard's unprofessional conduct, and gaps in the application process have created significant frustration. Residents report feeling unheard when reporting serious concerns, and some describe the property as unsafe for families. The contradiction is stark: recent five-star reviews highlight renovations, maintenance gains, and supportive staff, while one-star accounts from the same period describe ongoing pest problems, deposit issues, and a culture where complaints are dismissed. The property appears to be mid-transition, with front-office wins offset by backend failures in property management and tenant safety.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Standard at Domain Northside Apartments
#42
63

The Standard at Domain Northside Apartments

3.7(326)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team's recent overhaul, with Maintenance Supervisor Yonny Mendez-Pinto and technicians like Eduardo and Emilio earning consistent recognition for proactive, quick repairs and visible property involvement. The leasing team, particularly Alexis and Nathan, draws repeated compliments for knowledge and warmth. However, serious safety complaints surface: two residents report unaddressed lock issues, car break-ins, and roach sightings, with management perceived as dismissive rather than accountable. New renters and six-year residents alike note strong soundproofing and walkability, but the mix of five-star praise and one-star crises reflects an inconsistent experience. Current management and maintenance appear more engaged than in prior years, yet safety issues and deposit disputes remain red flags. The property's 60% five-star rating masks deeper tensions between amenity quality and resident protection.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Astra Avery Ranch
#43
66

Astra Avery Ranch

3.9(145)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team (Shabana, Chris, Elysa named often) for attentive service and the grounds for cleanliness and amenities, with recent management changes noted as an improvement. Persistent complaints center on thin floors letting sound through, recurring plumbing clogs in shared lines, and management's slow response to problems like pest infestations and neighbor noise, with some feeling the "luxury" label misleads about actual living quality.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 Housing
Village at Gracy Farms
#44
63

Village at Gracy Farms

3.7(226)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tour experience and leasing rank among the best at the complex: staff member Andrea and the grounds consistently earn five-star marks from prospects. Once residents move in, experiences split sharply. Some enjoy responsive maintenance (Rodrigo cited by name multiple times for quick repairs) and quiet surroundings. Others face months of pest infestations management refuses to escalate, locked emergency access ignored, and security deposits withheld nearly a year with only email promises of resolution. The property shines on first visit but stumbles on follow-through. Emergency calls go unanswered. Pest control comes without notice and is marked as refused when no one is home. Management rarely initiates contact on complaints, even when residents attempt cleanouts themselves. The five-star praise is concentrated among new prospects and longer-term residents with routine needs; the one and two-star reviews cluster around unresolved crises and departed residents still seeking money back.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Presidium Tech Ridge Apartments
#45
61

Presidium Tech Ridge Apartments

3.6(131)✓ Google-verified

New residents often encounter sleek units and attentive staff, but this honeymoon fades quickly. The persistent complaints center on management becoming unresponsive once you move in, maintenance delays stretching into months for basic fixes, and common areas (pool, dog park, BBQ) deteriorating without consistent upkeep. Rent exceeds $1,500 a month for what reviewers call substandard care and accountability. The complex lists luxury amenities but falls short on delivery. Staff members like Alondra, Bailey, Danna, and Ezequiel receive individual praise, yet the office phone goes unanswered, after-hours emergencies route to voicemail, and promised same-day repairs fail to appear. One resident spent ten months without bathroom lights; another waited over eight months for an EV charger to be serviced. Multiple reviewers warn against leaving honest reviews while still a tenant, citing staff retaliation.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The James on Grand Avenue
#46
62

The James on Grand Avenue

3.8(104)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The James draws praise for helpful leasing staff, responsive maintenance, and fair pricing for newer units in a convenient North Austin location. However, reviews flag significant frustration over noisy tenants (especially at the pool on weekends), roach infestations, a frequently broken elevator, and poor neighbor behavior like pet waste and vandalism. Quality of life depends heavily on which neighbors you get.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 HousingStudent Housing
Terrastone Travesia Apartments
#47
60

Terrastone Travesia Apartments

3.7(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Terrastone draws strong praise for its green spaces, friendly leasing staff (notably Florita), and upkeep during occupancy. However, tenants report serious friction at move-out: mysterious fees, delayed refund discussions, and incorrect rental history reporting that damaged future applications. Maintenance complaints linger unresolved. Current residents rate the experience well; former tenants often feel mishandled.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Loretta
#48
61

The Loretta

3.9(45)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Isaac, the maintenance technician, earns consistent five-star mentions for fast, considerate service and keeping grounds litter-free. However, deeper complaints surface around office dysfunction: delayed deposit refunds, security indifference to vehicle theft, and a serious allegation of disability discrimination in income verification that allegedly resulted in $8,000+ overcharges. The split between maintenance praise and office-level failures defines the experience here.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Residences at the Domain
#49
59

Residences at the Domain

3.1(222)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals report sharply different experiences. Some who have stayed multiple years praise staff responsiveness and the location; however, the majority of reviewers describe aging buildings, broken elevators, and maintenance that does not stick. The property's biggest friction point is parking: residents report vehicles towed from spots with missing or unclear signage, with management refusing accountability. A second major pain is hidden fees. Residents discover $70/month mandatory WiFi charges, separate electric bills for chiller systems, credit card payment processing fees, and newly announced parking charges. Staff member Karissa receives consistent praise for helpfulness, but others are described as dismissive or rude. The gap between the "luxury" positioning and actual conditions frustrates tenants most.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Wayman
#50
59

The Wayman

3.5(382)✓ Google-verified

Leasing and office staff shine: Joel, Tanya, and the team consistently earn praise for patient, knowledgeable tours and professional handling of applications. Residents appreciate the location near the Domain, pool, outdoor kitchen, and peaceful surroundings. However, the property struggles with maintenance execution. Multiple tenants report water leaks from pipe bursts and ceiling fans, slow repairs (including a 7-month dishwasher delay), cockroach infestations, and management reluctance to offer credits for resident-affecting damage. New management appears to have improved responsiveness, but systemic issues remain. The sharp split between five-star tours and one-star resident complaints suggests the leasing experience masks operational shortcomings once tenants move in. The pet-friendly and student housing markets should note: first impressions are polished, but property condition and maintenance speed are points of friction. Veterinary-damage claims and pest concerns warrant direct questions during tours.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Canyon Springs at Bull Creek
#51
59

Canyon Springs at Bull Creek

3.6(60)✓ Google-verified

Bull Creek location and scenic trails draw praise, and when staff are consistent, residents report quick leasing and friendly service. Recent turnover has created friction: maintenance now delays weeks, older appliances fail repeatedly, and management communication has turned combative during move-outs and repairs. One resident documented 19 unresolved work orders including water damage and visible mold despite manager assurances otherwise. Earlier reports of professional, attentive management contrast sharply with recent accounts.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Creekside on Parmer Lane
#52
58

Creekside on Parmer Lane

3.4(173)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tenants consistently split into two camps: those praising fast maintenance response and a welcoming office staff (including named team members Billy and Margarita), and those frustrated by deteriorating conditions, pest infestations, and management that dismisses complaints. Structural problems like thin walls, damaged carpets, stained units, and broken drainage persist for months; aggressive towing ($800 in fees reported in one month), intrusive security tactics, and application denials without clear upfront guidance add friction. Despite claiming luxury status, reviews highlight cheap materials, poor soundproofing, and cost misalignment with quality. The property appeals to early-move residents or those staying short-term who encounter responsive staff; longer-term renters report management becomes indifferent after leasing. Domestic disturbances and non-functional security gates undercut the safe-community pitch. A three-year resident still rates it five stars, but recent reviews show deterioration, with management blamed for staffing gaps and tenant dismissal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
West Cove Apartments
#53
57 low data

West Cove Apartments

3.8(14)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

West Cove offers budget-friendly rentals in Anderson Mill with occasional specials, but reviews consistently flag slow maintenance response (repairs waiting months) and management that is hard to reach. Move-out disputes over normal wear and tear, bed bug incidents handled as tenant responsibility, and pest problems make this a case where low upfront rent may not reflect true cost of occupancy.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Beck at Wells Branch
#54
57

Beck at Wells Branch

3.3(481)✓ Google-verified

Beck at Wells Branch shows a sharp divide: new management staff like Rachel and Ernesto have won over recent residents with fast, thorough service and genuine care, yet structural and maintenance problems run deep. Water leaks, burst pipes, roaches, and slow repairs plague units; the pool closes repeatedly during summer, security lapses recur, and AC emergencies get dismissed. Long-term residents praise the turnaround under Providence Real Estate, but newer tenants still discover hidden costs and ongoing failures once they move in. The leasing office has become a bright spot, with staff handling rent issues and move-ins smoothly. What matters most: whether new management can actually fix the building's poor construction and maintenance backlog before you sign. Residents here pay for location and apparent savings, not peace of mind.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Gallery at Domain
#55
57

Gallery at Domain

3.4(480)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents speak warmly of maintenance speed, monthly food trucks, and a walkable North Austin location near Domain. Newer or departing residents report a stark divide: staff either solve problems promptly or ignore them entirely, leasing communications often mislead on move-in timing and costs, and deposit deductions feel aggressive. Maintenance excels for some; pest complaints, dead keyless-entry batteries, and broken garage doors plague others. The community works if your needs align with management's competence in your building. At price point, leasing pushes steep rent increases via software-driven raises, and lock outs cost $100. Management's reputation splits sharply on response to security concerns, water damage, and pest control. Families with young children and those renting under Section 8 have filed complaints suggesting inconsistent or dismissive treatment.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 Housing
Bridge at Midtown Commons Apartments
#56
63

Bridge at Midtown Commons Apartments

3.7(401)✓ Google-verified

Half of reviewers rave about the location, quiet atmosphere, and leasing team warmth. The other half describe a property hamstrung by deferred maintenance: broken doors and elevators, persistent security gaps, and trash throughout common areas. Staff like Cheyenne, Tyler, and Aliex earn consistent individual praise, but infrastructure failures undermine their efforts. The premium price tag does not match the tired interiors, old appliances, and safety gaps residents encounter.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
Townhollow Apartments
#57
63

Townhollow Apartments

3.9(77)✓ Google-verified

Townhollow offers rare value in central Zilker, backed by maintenance staff who consistently earn praise for fast, thorough repairs. The location steps from downtown and South Lamar appeals to cost-conscious renters who tolerate trade-offs: no gates mean security vulnerabilities, management communication lags, and occasional homeless presence. Strong bones and community feel attract long-term residents willing to overlook aging infrastructure in exchange for walkability and affordability.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
MacKenzie Pointe Apartments
#58
81

MacKenzie Pointe Apartments

4.5(129)✓ Google-verified

Most residents stay for years, citing low rent for spacious one to three bedroom units close to UT, downtown, and Mueller. Management staff (Margaret Demirs, Alecia Major, Daniel in maintenance) respond quickly to requests and treat residents as community rather than customers. The gated property stays pest-free and secure; shared laundry works well, though larger units offer in-unit options. Maintenance is reliably responsive even on the older building.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Point South and Bridge Hollow Apartments
#59
58

Point South and Bridge Hollow Apartments

3.1(145)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the Riverside location, responsive staff, and particularly the affordability. Management and maintenance address problems quickly, and those staying past the first year often renew. The grounds feel safe to many, with low crime relative to nearby student housing. However, pest problems divide reviewers sharply-some see roaches as minimal, others report infestations. Walls are thin enough to hear neighbors clearly. Parking lacks cameras, creating theft worry. Most troubling are reports that leasing staff misrepresented applicant approval, collecting fees from rejected applicants, and a pattern of charging renewals above market rates while advertising lower prices to newcomers.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Oakville Apartments
#60
54

Oakville Apartments

3.4(280)✓ Google-verified

Oakville's 3.4-star rating reflects deep maintenance and management problems that overshadow its amenities. Residents report maintenance tickets marked solved without any work done, persistent roaches and pest infestations despite pest control fees, 15-month-broken gate security, and widespread package theft. Leasing staff are often unreachable or dismissive, though standout staff like Krystal and fast-moving teams occasionally earn praise. AC failures, unpermitted unit entries, and poor common-area upkeep are chronic issues that management appears unwilling to address.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Mosaic at Mueller Luxury Apartments
#61
58

Mosaic at Mueller Luxury Apartments

3.1(331)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews praise the location, gym, and maintenance staff's responsiveness, but the other half describe months-long elevator failures, a garage gate stuck open for security breaches, and one resident reporting dozens of cockroaches daily. Long-time residents cite repeated vehicle break-ins, package theft, and broken security cameras despite monthly maintenance fees. The gap between what leasing staff can deliver and what ownership invests in fixing is the core complaint. Staff turnover and corporate management distance leave on-site teams overwhelmed. Apartment finishes are solid (granite, stainless, spacious), but building-wide systems (elevators, access doors, pest control, mailroom cameras) remain broken for months. Newer residents with leasing staff like Sabrina report smooth moves, while residents staying 3-5 years document worsening security and unresolved maintenance cycles.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Vantage at McKinney Falls
#62
71

Vantage at McKinney Falls

4.4(93)✓ Google-verified

A property divided by staff performance: leasing team members like Julissa, Karla, and Beth earn consistent praise for patience, knowledge, and willingness to help after hours, making the move-in experience smooth and welcoming. However, residents report a sharp decline under current management, with repeated air conditioning breakdowns lasting days, mounting billing errors that require constant follow-up, and a complaints office that ignores issues including animals left outside without care, security gate left open, and late-night pool noise. Climate control emerges as the critical failure: multiple tenants describe units reaching 90 degrees for weeks, temporary fixes that last days, and refusals to provide relief while power bills spike. One resident renewed their lease during better times, then regretted it after the management change; another faced financial penalties for early exit over uninhabitable conditions. The contradiction is sharp: five-star reviews from recent tours cite pristine apartments and professional care, while one-star reviews from current residents describe unbearable summer living and a management that dismisses complaints.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Camino Flats Apartments
#63
71

Camino Flats Apartments

4.3(67)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Two years of consistent care define the experience here. Residents repeatedly credit Marla and Coco for turning responsiveness into habit-maintenance calls get real-time phone updates, small problems vanish in hours, and the office staff treat lease issues as personal. The apartments themselves are spacious and actually equipped with washers, dryers, and full kitchens, a rarity in student housing. The gated grounds feel safe and quiet despite being a short walk to UT Austin. Location wins over age. The four-minute walk to the bus, grocery stores nearby, and proximity to campus offset the fact that this is an older building (you'll see water-damage patches on some ceilings, though they stayed out of most units). Weekly pest control keeps insects rare. The courtyards, fire pit, and outdoor TV create real social space. West Campus noise from nearby fraternities happens here like everywhere in that zone.

Student HousingTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
District on La Frontera
#64
53

District on La Frontera

2.9(359)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half of recent reviews are one or two stars, with tenants reporting roaches, ants, and broken appliances that linger for weeks despite repeated maintenance requests. Several describe office staff as unwelcoming to prospective renters and dismissive or rude to residents, though a few name positive interactions with Luz and Lisa. When repairs do happen, reviewers report mix-ups between units, careless work, and staff marking tickets complete when nothing has been fixed. A pattern emerges: move-in apartments look different from tours, management stops responding after lease signing, and fees for pest control and package handling continue even as services fail. One tenant moved out after five months, withheld rent due to zero repairs on the initial walkthrough list, and alleged the office falsified court documents. Another noted the gym remains closed and describes frequent loud noise and drug paraphernalia at the pool.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Morgan
#65
53

The Morgan

3.1(445)✓ Google-verified

The Morgan struggles with chronic maintenance and management failures. Residents report mold, water leaks, broken appliances, and pest problems left unaddressed for months despite repeated requests. Staff are widely described as unresponsive, combative, and unwilling to resolve issues even when violations of rental agreements occur. A small number of recent move-ins praised individual staff members and amenities, but the overwhelming pattern shows deteriorating conditions under current management, with unpaid contractor debts affecting services residents pay for.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Greystone Flats Apartments
#66
57

Greystone Flats Apartments

3.1(99)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Greystone split sharply after a management change. For years under Ellen and Cruz, residents praised responsive maintenance, good value, and a peaceful, dog-friendly vibe near campus. Since the recent takeover, multiple reviews report an empty pool all summer, ignored AC failures, cockroach and flea problems, closed office hours, and staff departures. The tension is stark: five-star loyalty from the prior era clashes with one-star warnings from recent months about deteriorating conditions and unreachable management. The property occupies a real space between segments. Its starting rents ($999-$1,569/month) and in-unit washer/dryer appeal to students and budget-conscious renters, yet older bones (1970s-80s buildings) and recent service failures undercut any "luxury" positioning. Pets are welcome with a bark park, though reviewers note it goes unmaintained. The management crisis is the pivot point: the same buildings that residents once called a hidden gem now face questions about basic upkeep and tenant care.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Warwick Apartments
#67
68

Warwick Apartments

4.0(40)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the maintenance team's speed and kindness, with multiple five-star reviews naming Alex and Corey for fixing issues within hours. Staff in the front office and leasing are described as helpful and organized. The Heritage location near UT and downtown appeals to tenants seeking both access and relative quiet. Remodeled units feel modern, though the complex itself is older and comes with typical aging-building quirks that residents say are manageable. The property management company (Rainier Properties) handles day-to-day operations professionally. Lease renewal is common among long-term residents. Review evidence is substantial but focuses heavily on maintenance and leasing experience; other apartment amenities and community life receive minimal mention.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Stone Oak at Parmer
#68
60

Stone Oak at Parmer

3.3(222)✓ Google-verified

Yankel and select staff earn consistent praise for welcoming new residents, but maintenance response times create real frustration: some requests take weeks or go unaddressed entirely. Residents report quick fixes when they escalate in person, yet the online portal and initial office contact often stall. The community itself feels good, amenities exist, yet gym equipment deteriorates and promised improvements (like a fenced dog area) languish for years. Experience depends heavily on which staff member you reach and whether you push hard enough. The split between five-star leasing reviews and one-star maintenance complaints reflects a business that handles the front end well but struggles with follow-through. Repeat residents who know whom to ask for (Yankel, Jay, Quay, James) and who follow up in person get better outcomes than those relying on the portal or front desk alone.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Villas at Stone Oak Ranch
#69
67

Villas at Stone Oak Ranch

3.9(241)✓ Google-verified

Many residents praise Jose and the maintenance team for fast, thorough responses to repair requests, with leasing associates like Dina and Heather noted for their helpfulness during move-in. The complex sits near HEB, Costco, and parks with free parking and valet trash pickup. However, multiple tenants report management retained full security deposits for normal wear and tear (citing Texas Property Code violations), misrepresented carpet replacement policies at lease signing, and dismissed deposit disputes with form responses despite photo evidence of no damage. A pattern of appliance failures emerges across reviews (AC breakdowns, washing machine issues, oven malfunction). Long-term residents express strong satisfaction, yet short-term tenants encountered unresponsive follow-up on promised services (free move-out cleaning, lease bonus communications) and charged monthly fees blamed on shared waste bin misuse. The disconnect between friendly on-site maintenance and dismissive management response to post-move disputes stands as the core tension in the reviews.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Sienna at the Thompson
#70
65

Sienna at the Thompson

4.1(140)✓ Google-verified

Sienna's leasing staff, especially Tabitha, win consistent praise for attentiveness and hospitality during tours. The downtown location and views are genuine draws, as is the concierge service. Long-term residents report a different picture: elevator outages lasting weeks, poorly maintained shared facilities (sauna broken for months, cold plunge empty), and street noise that carries into units-particularly from Dirty 6th and nearby venues until late at night. Recent additions (a $200 monthly club fee) and documented safety gaps (no parking cameras, maintenance staff theft caught on camera, security banging on doors) leave residents frustrated despite the building's appearance. For people planning short stays or focused on the tour experience, the staff shines. Those staying longer face ongoing equipment failures, noise complaints, safety concerns, and a cumulative cost significantly above base rent when parking ($200) and the amenity club fee ($200) are added.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Eastwood
#71
56

The Eastwood

3.4(63)✓ Google-verified

The Eastwood splits sharply between those who praise Donna's leasing help and the maintenance team's responsiveness, and those burnt by management turmoil, poor communication, and unresolved deposit disputes. Recent reviews flag the pool closed for weeks with fees still charged, a dirty laundry room with cramped $2.35-per-load machines, and rent that feels high given the wear on units. Location near UT Austin and transit are genuine draws for students, but management's inconsistency is the core complaint.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Penthouse Apartments
#72
58 low data

Penthouse Apartments

3.7(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Penthouse scores well for location and staff kindness, with residents consistently praising quick maintenance fixes and the friendly office team. Older infrastructure and inconsistent management practices drag the experience down: water damage goes unaddressed, pest control falls through, and tenants report poor communication during leasing and work order delays.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
River Oaks Apartments
#73
56

River Oaks Apartments

3.4(49)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the staff's attentiveness and the unbeatable location near UT and downtown Austin, with competitive pricing for the area. Maintenance staff like Pepe and Martin handle requests quickly, and leasing agent Toni earns consistent recognition for making the move-in process effortless and professional. The main friction points are the seasonal heating-AC system that can't switch mid-season, persistent roach presence despite pest control efforts, and the reality of an older building with thinner walls and limited closet space. Residents who accept these trade-offs for the affordable rent and location find it a genuine bargain; those expecting newer finishes are disappointed.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Tanglewood North Apartments
#74
55 low data

Tanglewood North Apartments

3.5(47)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tanglewood North draws praise for affordability, proximity to UT and transit, and staff responsiveness (Maddie, Gina, Eva, Heather named). Drawbacks surface repeatedly: pest problems (roaches, rats), laundry room failures, aging infrastructure, and aggressive annual rent increases (200-400 dollars). Location and free utilities matter most to satisfied residents; those burned by maintenance gaps and pests left with strong warnings.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
San Gabriel Square
#75
47

San Gabriel Square

2.7(68)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers praise San Gabriel Square for its UT-adjacent location, low rent, and genuinely warm front-desk staff-especially Zoe, who speaks Spanish and answers questions patiently. However, a sharp recent turn: multiple tenants report widespread roach infestations even in clean units, non-functional washers leaving stains, no in-unit thermostats, and erratic water temperature. Move-out charges ($460+) and $75 admin fees frustrate departing residents. Maintenance does respond on some issues, but structural pest and mechanical problems persist unresolved.

Student Housing

Connect with featured partners to check availability

How many apartments do you want to compare

By sending this inquiry, you agree it will be shared with the leasing offices and property managers relevant to your request.

Enquiries submitted through our forms may be shared with partner providers who can do the work, and we may receive a referral fee. Our rankings are based solely on our published scoring method and are not affected by referral fees.

Common questions about student housing

How much does student housing cost in Austin, TX?
Rates vary widely by proximity to campus and how new the property is. Older, farther-out buildings near Riverside or North Campus tend to run cheaper per bed than newer high-rises in West Campus, and per-bed pricing usually rises with private bathrooms, in-unit laundry, and included amenities like a pool or gym. Always ask for the total monthly cost including utilities and fees, not just the advertised base rent.
When should I start looking for student housing?
Many popular Austin properties near UT start leasing for the next school year as early as the previous fall, sometimes 10 to 12 months ahead. Waiting until summer before move-in usually means a smaller pool of units and less room to negotiate on price or lease length.
What should I expect from a lease term?
Most student housing in Austin runs on 12-month leases starting in August, even though the school year ends in May. Some properties offer shorter or academic-year leases, but they are less common and often priced higher per month. Check the sublease policy if you plan to be away for a summer.
How can I judge the quality of a student housing property before signing?
Look past the marketing photos and check recent resident reviews for patterns on maintenance response time, noise, and how the leasing office handles move-out charges. A property with consistently reported quick maintenance turnaround and clear billing tends to be a safer bet than one with a nice pool but scattered complaints about deposits or repairs.

Last updated 2026-09-22