Page 5 of 5: businesses ranked 401-436 of 436. Start from the top.
On the Green splits sharply between five-star repeat tenants who praise staff like Chelsea and Alexis, and one-star departures citing poor communication, excessive move-out bills (one resident charged $2,478 after deposit), and unprofessional office conduct. The peaceful community and lower rents attract renters, but utilities are not tenant-controlled and maintenance often lags.
Five-star reviews praise the leasing agent Kameron and maintenance team Matt for quick responses, noting the quiet neighborhood feel and well-kept amenities draw repeat residents. Yet deposit disputes over cleaning charges and serious complaints about water damage, roaches, and unresponsive management over months reveal cracks: some residents faced collection agency action after early lease exits, and one caller reported the office ignored their phone calls entirely. The 3.3-star rating reflects this split. Most who stay long-term renew; those who faced emergencies or damage disputes leave angry. Montecito seems to hinge on whether your lease stays smooth or you need help fast.
Avery Oaks splits sharply: long-term residents praise the well-kept grounds, pool, and specific staff like Martha and Yvonne, but many report a complex plagued by break-ins, poor soundproofing, and management indifference to resident safety. Over half of reviews are one or two stars. Several residents cite serious issues: garage and car thefts, broken gates staying unfixed for months, police calls for door entry attempts, and CCTV gaps beyond the entrance. Noise complaints echo across reviews-parties, fireworks, screaming at 2 a.m.-with little management response. Move-out fees charged despite residents following stated procedures fuel allegations of unfair billing. Individual staff members (particularly Martha Montes and Yvonne) earn consistent praise for care and responsiveness.
Leasing agents like Alexis Edwards and Star earn consistent five-star praise for helpfulness during tours and move-ins, and some residents report satisfaction with unit interiors and the quieter setting. However, reviews reveal severe operational collapse: emergency maintenance requests go unanswered for weeks or months, AC units fail in triple-digit heat with no response, leaking ceilings and mold persist unchecked, and office phones ring unanswered. Multiple residents describe a recent management overhaul that worsened already poor communication. One resident documented mail theft after staff failed to secure a compromised mailbox, and another reported belongings discarded while their lease remained active. The disconnect between leasing staff and operations is stark. Where initial experiences shine, post-move-in reality deteriorates rapidly: parking is riddled with potholes, common areas collect trash for months, and residents in crisis (94-degree apartments, health risks, stolen mail) encounter silence. Spanish-speaking residents report being ignored at the office. The property's attributes (dog park, pool, fitness) exist but are described as poorly maintained, with the pool closed mid-summer and billiards lounge noticeably absent from recent resident feedback.
Reviewers report sharp differences in experience. Those who moved in recently praise quick maintenance response and friendly staff, particularly noting Billy and Margarita. Longer-term residents describe declining conditions: ants, hornets in stairwells, filthy shared spaces, parking shortages, and $800 monthly towing fees. Management communication is mixed-some find staff transparent and helpful; others report gatekeeping behavior, unresponsive leadership, and accusations without clear proof. The application process drew complaints about unclear documentation requirements and non-refundable fees.
Long-term residents praise the location, pool, and individual leasing agents like Ryleigh, but polarized reviews reveal deeper operational gaps. Maintenance response times are inconsistent; gate repairs lapse for weeks; phone calls go unanswered and visitors face surprise towing fees. Pest invasions and delayed AC service have driven recent departures. The property looks appealing on tours but day-to-day management and security follow-through disappoint.
Ascent is sharply split: newer residents and those who interacted with office staff like Paty praise responsive management and security, but a significant block reports months without air conditioning, silent water cuts, uncontrolled pest issues, and office staff who do not return calls or texts. Leasing practices have included bait-and-switch rent increases and slow, incomplete refunds. The complex appears to have seen leadership changes recently, with mixed results: some units benefit from attentive maintenance when systems are functioning, while others remain in disrepair.
Staff like Amanda and Alejandra earn consistent praise for attentiveness and quick problem-solving, and new management has brought noticeable improvements to responsiveness. However, the property suffers from systemic infrastructure problems: residents report recurring water outages without notice, mold left unaddressed for weeks, and pest infestations that maintenance failed to treat properly. Long-term residents describe a pattern of deteriorating conditions despite rent reductions, with code compliance involvement and unresolved HVAC, plumbing, and structural issues that force some to leave. Management communication relies heavily on an AI chatbot, making it hard to reach humans, and residents report facing application fee disputes without follow-up. The leasing team and amenities (pool, gym, grills) draw interest from new tours, but serious maintenance backlogs and health hazards create a gap between welcome first impressions and the reality of living there.
Hillside Place attracts praise for select staff members-particularly Maxell and Avery-who handle tours and leasing with warmth and speed. The quiet neighborhood and clean appearance also stand out to satisfied renters. However, a vocal minority report serious operational failures: pest infestations go unaddressed, washers stay broken for months, A/C fails repeatedly, and management becomes unresponsive once residents move in. Hidden fees, utility overages, and move-out disputes have left some tenants feeling trapped and unsupported. Long-term residents and those needing reliable maintenance should be cautious. The gap between leasing-day charm and post-move service is stark. Renters cite months-long waits for repairs, ignored pest complaints, and surprise charges that inflate the advertised "affordable" rent significantly over lease duration.
Museo offers a quiet North Austin location with a responsive leasing team, especially through staff member Jillian, but maintenance response has deteriorated under recent management. Multiple long-term residents report unresolved appliance failures, plumbing problems, and noise complaints that went unaddressed for months, alongside billing disputes and security concerns including theft and broken gate access. The property itself is well-situated, but operational responsiveness to resident issues remains inconsistent. Newer arrivals highlight clean spaces and professional tours, yet the 3.6-star rating reflects a persistent gap between leasing-office speed and maintenance follow-through. Former residents cite refund delays and management unresponsiveness even after move-out. The complex sits near hiking trails and good schools, but long-term satisfaction appears heavily dependent on which management cycle you occupy.
Frank and Yailien's recent leadership has drawn consistent praise for friendliness and responsiveness, with residents noting clean spaces and fast maintenance turnarounds. However, this turnaround masks a long history of neglect: older reviews document rats in walls, roach and bed bug infestations, broken mailboxes, and a pool shut down by city health authorities-complaints that lingered for years under prior management. The property sits at a crossroads. Five-star reviewers from the last year credit Harbor Group's improvements and pest control efforts. Older one- and two-star reviews from the same location describe hazardous conditions and management indifference. The 51% five-star, 39% one-star split reflects two different eras of the same complex.
Three years of mostly routine living marred by a persistent pipe leak that never fully resolved, musty ground-floor dampness, and an ongoing cockroach problem. Maintenance responds quickly to most requests, and the location near North Lamar amenities is strong, but recent move-in ready units have tested negative (filthy conditions, signs of mold and pests), and water damage tied to electrical wiring poses health risks.
Most recent reviews flag serious maintenance failures, unresponsive staff, and safety issues. One reviewer reported no hot water since move-in; another found non-functional air conditioning, broken outlets, and stove on arrival despite move-in fees. Pest infestations, neighborhood noise, constant package theft, and transient foot traffic appear repeatedly. Two isolated five-star reviews from years ago mention quiet and cleanliness, but 35% one/two-star ratings and 59% five-star reflect extreme polarization, with the weight of current complaints centered on habitability, management accountability, and security.
Current residents describe a complex in a nice area with decent amenities that has declined sharply since management changed. Pest and mold problems, inflated utility bills, and staff unavailability plague the experience. Move-out fees often exceed deposits by thousands, leaving residents disputing charges in collections. While maintenance responds quickly in rare bright moments, most repairs go incomplete or unaddressed. The office is frequently unreachable during business hours. Residents report aggressive deposit increases mid-lease, discriminatory enforcement of pet policies, and rental application denials that others attribute to broken screening systems. The community feels hostile rather than welcoming, especially to residents with service animals or those questioning charges.
Long-term residents praise the maintenance team and peaceful setting, but a large bloc of reviews document aggressive management practices: unexpected charges tacked onto rent, slow response to security breaches (car windows broken, strangers on balconies), and harsh eviction pressure over late fees. The split is stark: 30% five-star loyalty contrasts sharply with 48% one/two-star complaints centered on unpredictable costs and disrespectful treatment.
Location and maintenance staff earn strong marks, but persistent appliance failures, train noise, and management neglect frustrate long-term residents. The leasing office is hard to reach, amenities like rooftop wifi stay broken without notice, and security concerns including package theft go unaddressed despite rent increases under Greystar ownership.
Opinions split sharply: recent residents and those working with named staff (Nacharlie, Manuel, Yorayi) report smooth move-ins and welcoming service, while long-term tenants describe a cycle of promises broken after lease signing. The central complaint across multiple reviews is uncontrolled rodent and pest infestation despite repeated pest control visits, paired with months-long maintenance backlogs (AC out since February, water leaks ignored, structural issues like sinking bathtubs). Units often arrive in worse condition than photos show, with broken appliances and missing amenities. The new management team appears to be making changes, yet billing remains chaotic (unsanctioned charges, double-charging for internet despite lease terms), and work orders result in temporary fixes that never become permanent. Staff friendliness and responsiveness during the leasing process does not persist into the tenancy. One positive: corporate (Harbor Group) intervenes when contacted directly, though reaching them requires escalation. The Mueller location itself draws mixed views: affordable walkability offset by aging buildings and community behavior concerns.
Residents credit Jamie and Manuel for smooth lease approval and helpful onboarding, and praise the Brentwood location. However, systematic management failures dominate complaints: multiple applicants report months without response or denial explanations, maintenance workers enter units without notice and leave jobs half-done, and several tenants allege deposit withholding or unit substitution. Water quality, plumbing defects, and theft remain persistent issues.
Severe structural and maintenance failures dominate resident accounts. Widespread roach and rat infestations persist despite pest control treatments; roof repairs leak in first rain, causing damage to units. Mold exposure sent at least one resident to the emergency room. Power outages, hot water failures, and laundry facility breakdowns are chronic. Noise from parties and disruptive neighbors occurs nightly; management is slow to intervene. A handful of older residents praise staff responsiveness and community events, but the weight of recent complaints about unsafe conditions, rising rent, and poor management is overwhelming.
Chevy Chase Downs lands far below the luxury apartments category average with a 2.8 rating across 104 reviews. While a small group reports quick fixes and friendly service, the overwhelming pattern is broken appliances ignored for months, widespread theft, gunshots, and management that collects rent but ignores tenant calls. Reviewers cite roaches, faulty electrical wiring, thin walls, and laundry rooms perpetually out of service. The $400 referral bonus is flagged as frequently withheld. Infrastructure from the 1980s shows decay, and the complex feels more like a cheap holding operation than a luxury residence.
ATX North offers attractive units and pools, with a few staff members genuinely attentive to tenant concerns. However, half the reviews are one or two stars, driven by chronic maintenance failures, unresponsive management during emergencies, security deposit disputes, and aggressive enforcement of minor lease violations. The complex appears to swing between excellent and problematic depending on which staff member you reach.
Hillside on Parmer's 3.2 rating reflects a sharp split: roughly half give five stars, half give one or two. New residents praise the buildings, grounds, and maintenance responsiveness, but this honeymoon often sours fast. Soundproofing fails badly, with neighbors' footsteps loud enough to shake beds and interrupt sleep. Water leaks, malfunctioning garages, and unreliable trash pickup compound the frustration. The towing arrangement is a flashpoint: a third-party service (Parking Compliance Solutions) tows vehicles without warning, even when owners registered with the complex, and extracts $350 to release them. Management communication is inconsistent, and resident complaints about noisy or disruptive neighbors go unresolved despite repeated reports. The maintenance team earns genuine credit for speed and helpfulness when called, and new arrivals often highlight the freshness of finishes and amenities like the pool. Staff names like Grace, Brittany, and Martins appear in positive reviews. But structural shortcuts became visible within weeks: mold, water intrusion, faulty AC units that took two weeks to repair, broken windows at move-in. Over time, residents describe feeling trapped between poor construction, lax enforcement of neighbor conduct, and an unresponsive management layer.
Five-star reviews praise affordable rent, modern finishes, and nearby amenities. Manuel, a staff member, earned specific kudos for responsiveness and property improvement. However, a large segment reports roach infestations, foul-smelling water, broken elevators, inadequate security, and unresponsive management. Several tenants cite safety concerns and months-long maintenance delays. A refund dispute extends beyond three months post-vacate.
Residents report serious issues with cleanliness at move-in, unresponsive management, water outages, and pest control. Early morning trash pickup, late-night noise, and a deposit charged for pre-existing damage frustrated long-term tenants. One staff member was cited for dismissing pest complaints in favor of removing posted notices.
Mixed ratings mask a pattern of dissatisfaction. While a few residents noted nice views and paid premium rates, most complaints center on neglected interiors, limited kid activities, and access problems with shared facilities.
Two recent tenants praise attentive management and fast maintenance fixes. But older reviews cite months-long neglect of repair requests, pest problems, and health hazards like mold and paint fumes. The stark split suggests either recent changes or highly uneven unit-by-unit experience.
One year-long stay surfaced persistent AC failures, severe pest issues, and slow maintenance response, though a maintenance staff member Gabriel earned praise. Limited detail from the sparse review set on daily living.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Staff like Ahmed deliver fast repairs when they arrive, but getting the maintenance team to the apartment is slow; services appear fragmented across outside vendors. Early-stage review snapshot limits the picture.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited. The business states it has operated for 29 years and offers credit repair, rapid rescoring, collections negotiation, and mortgage-readiness coaching in Austin and Greater Austin, with FCRA-compliant and FDCPA dispute strategies. Pricing for Core, Accelerated, and Elite programs requires a custom quote.
Landing Furnished Apartments at Bellrock La Frontera offers fully-furnished one and two bedroom units in north Austin near The Domain, with in-unit laundry, high-speed Wi-Fi, resort-style pool, and co-working space. Review evidence is limited.
Review evidence is limited. The business operates in Brentwood and claims smart home upgrades, keyless access, quartz countertops, and wood-style flooring in one-bedroom units.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-08
