Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu

Limestone Canyon Apartments

Updated 2026-09-08 · 3,787 reviewed · 917 listed · Scored from 62 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.7(62) 40 low data composite score See reviews on Google
Luxury Apartments
Location
North Austin, Austin
Service
Luxury Apartments
Reviews
62
Ranking
#619 in Luxury Apartments

Core details are sourced from this business's Google Business Profile (checked 2026-09-08).

What we found

Mixed ratings mask a pattern of dissatisfaction. While a few residents noted nice views and paid premium rates, most complaints center on neglected interiors, limited kid activities, and access problems with shared facilities.

Based on limited recent reviews, so treat this as low-confidence.

Praised for
  • nice views from some units
  • pleasant to visit
Watch-outs
  • interior maintenance neglected
  • poor amenities for children
  • mail access issues
  • overall poor condition
slow-maintenancepoor-soundproofing
Think twice if: Families with children and those prioritizing interior upkeep should look elsewhere; maintenance and child amenities are recurring concerns.

What this place gets right

  • units with views
  • location in North Austin

Before you tour or apply

  • One-bedroom units available on higher floors with views
  • Mail room access restricted

Resident ratings

Luxury Apartments
Premium pricing not matched by interior maintenance or family-friendly amenities.

How it stacks up

  • Rated 3.7 against a 4.01 average across the 777 luxury apartments businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 25% of the businesses in this directory.

How we scored this

How We Score
Star rating 19
Review volume 78
Review recency 10
Review sentiment 40
Profile completeness 50
Verification 0

Breaking down the ratings

5
27
4
13
3
8
2
4
1
10

Similar apartment complexes nearby

On The Green
58

On The Green

3.4(199)✓ Google-verified

On the Green splits sharply between five-star repeat tenants who praise staff like Chelsea and Alexis, and one-star departures citing poor communication, excessive move-out bills (one resident charged $2,478 after deposit), and unprofessional office conduct. The peaceful community and lower rents attract renters, but utilities are not tenant-controlled and maintenance often lags.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Langdon at Walnut Park
70

The Langdon at Walnut Park

4.2(242)✓ Google-verified

The property draws high praise for its landscaping, amenities (sauna, gym, pool), and certain staff members who shine during tours and maintenance visits. However, residents report serious friction: the AI phone system makes it nearly impossible to reach the office for maintenance or emergencies, lease renewals involve unexplained delays and sudden rent jumps (one reviewer cited a $2,085 to $2,700 increase), mold recurs in units, soundproofing fails to block neighbor noise, and break-ins and package theft occur despite gated parking. Management responsiveness improves only after complaints escalate to reviews. Staff like Jasmin, Joshua, Christopher, and David deliver warm, knowledgeable service during tours and maintenance calls. The stained concrete floors and proximity to the Walnut Creek greenbelt appeal to residents who value design and nature. Yet the gap between move-in experience and post-lease reality is stark: residents feel welcomed initially but unheard when problems arise, especially when trying to reach the office by phone or email.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Laurel Creek Apartments
54

Laurel Creek Apartments

3.4(30)✓ Google-verified

Strong individual staff members stand out, but the complex struggles with chronic pest problems, lax enforcement of lease rules, and management gaps that leave residents feeling unsafe. Early pricing is accessible, yet rent climbs steeply without corresponding improvements or security measures.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-09-08