Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
Laurel Creek Apartments logo

Laurel Creek Apartments

Updated 2026-07-17 · 2,441 reviewed · 809 listed · Scored from 29 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.5(29) 56 composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Luxury Apartments
Laurel Creek Apartments
Service
Luxury Apartments
Reviews
29

What we found

Laurel Creek started as an affordable find for families but has faced a sharp decline in resident quality and management oversight. Recent reviews describe unchecked pest infestation, drug use, theft, and domestic disputes, with management either unaware or indifferent. When staff like Thomas and Ikuzwe engage directly, they shine, but systemic issues around tenant vetting, maintenance speed, and safety have eroded trust. The physical space itself (natural light, finishes) draws praise, yet living conditions and sense of security have deteriorated markedly.

Recent shift: Marked decline visible over 2-3 years. Early residents (2021) report the space felt safe and home-like. By year two, crime spiked, pest problems emerged, and tenant screening appeared to loosen significantly. Most recent reviews (2024) describe ongoing struggle with roaches, staff attitude changes, and unresolved maintenance.

Praised for
  • staff professionalism when engaged
  • apartment finishes and natural light
  • affordability at entry point
  • community amenities for families
Watch-outs
  • pest infestation and roach spread
  • safety concerns and crime
  • lax tenant screening and management
  • thin walls and WiFi problems
  • maintenance responsiveness gaps
poor-communicationsafe-securepest-problemsclean-common-areasfriendly-staff
Best for: families seeking affordable rent and community support in North Austin
Think twice if: you prioritize safety, quiet, and consistent maintenance responsiveness. Recent reviews cite drug use, theft, roach infestation, and slow issue resolution.

What this place gets right

  • bright, naturally lit units
  • on-site learning center and food pantry
  • pet-friendly with dog park
  • wheelchair accessible throughout

Before you tour or apply

  • Thomas and Ikuzwe noted for patient, clear front-office service
  • pest control scheduling errors and delayed treatment in Building 3
  • rent increased from $980 to $1300 for 2-bed over 2 years
  • WiFi devices reported hosting roaches
  • cars stolen from parking lot
  • thin walls throughout

How it stacks up

  • Rated 3.5 against a 4.02 average across the 585 luxury apartments businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 8% of the businesses in this directory.

What keeps coming up

closetsnice apartmentswifihomelesscleanlinesskidsfurnituremaintenancedrug usersstaff

How we scored this

How We Score
Star rating 16
Review volume 64
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 45
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Rating breakdown

5
15
4
3
3
2
2
0
1
9

FAQ

Does Laurel Creek allow pets?
Yes. The complex is pet-friendly and features a dog park, though reviewers warn that off-leash dogs and aggressive behavior have been issues management has not adequately addressed.
Are there programs for kids?
Yes. Their website lists after-school care, summer camps, and a learning center with programming, but some reviewers noted limited outdoor activities and facilities specifically for children.
What wheelchair access is available?
The complex has a wheelchair-accessible entrance, accessible parking, and claims to be handicap-friendly throughout, per their website.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

On The Green
59

On The Green

3.4(195)✓ Google-verified

Recent guests and repeat residents praise the spacious floor plans, clean facilities, and individual staff members like Alexis and Chelsea who go the extra mile. Yet persistent complaints about communication delays, slow maintenance, and high move-out charges (especially for routine repairs like tub resurfacing and flooring) suggest management operations remain inconsistent, with quality heavily dependent on which staff member you connect with.

Luxury Apartments
Longspur Crossing
58

Longspur Crossing

2.8(152)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team and quiet atmosphere, but many new and departing tenants report shocking encounters with management over fees and lease enforcement. Security complaints about break-ins and fence breaches, combined with allegations of sudden non-renewals and dismissive handling of safety concerns, dominate negative reviews. One 16-year resident and a handful of satisfied tenants offer counterpoint, but the pattern suggests experience varies sharply by management interaction and tenure.

Luxury Apartments
The Rhett Apartments
68

The Rhett Apartments

4.3(65)✓ Google-verified

When staff members like Carolina and Annie are assigned to a case, move-in and approval feel smooth and welcoming. The property itself draws praise for its appearance and grounds. Yet the experience fractures for those who slip through the cracks: applicants report month-long waits with no follow-up, unreturned calls, and a deposit forfeit process that feels punitive. Maintenance requests and parking-lot security issues meet shoulder-shrugging indifference according to negative reviews. The gap between five-star and one-star experiences hinges on personal attention. Strong leasing agents make the approval process tolerable despite its length. When that attention lapses, frustration compounds quickly. Buyers considering a move here should expect the formal side of things to require patience and persistence on their own part.

Luxury Apartments

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-07-17