Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
Muse at SoCo logo

Muse at SoCo

Updated 2026-09-08 · 3,787 reviewed · 917 listed · Scored from 298 Google reviews · How we rank ›

4.0(298) 67 composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified Publishes prices
Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Muse at SoCo
Location
South River City, Austin
Services
Luxury Apartments, Pet-Friendly Apartments
Reviews
298
Ranking
#459 in Luxury Apartments
Best for
Young professionals prioritizing walkable location over maintenance responsiveness; those without upper-floor accessibility needs.

Core details are sourced from this business's Google Business Profile (checked 2026-09-08). Website-sourced details were fetched 2026-07-21.

What we found

The property offers strong walkability along South Congress and draws praise for some leasing staff, but residents report systemic problems that outweigh location appeal. Elevator breakdowns occur every other week in upper floors, maintenance requests sit unaddressed for months, and units arrive uncleaned with safety hazards like broken electrical outlets and inoperable appliances. Guest parking costs ($25 for two hours, $57 for a day) and resident parking fees ($75-80 monthly) are steep and strictly enforced. Management disputes and security deposit non-return have escalated to collections without proper notice, and mold, water damage, and package theft have been documented. While individual leasing team members like Jamie and Nicholas earn consistent praise, front-office responses to escalating issues follow a robotic pattern of deflection.

The $350 one-pet fee and $20 monthly pet rent reflect premium positioning, yet numerous reviews describe the property as unfinished and poorly maintained despite its luxury branding. Residents cite inconsistent security presence and unhoused individuals in stairwells as safety concerns. A pattern of rapid move-outs and turnover suggests the issues are not isolated complaints but structural problems with management accountability and property upkeep. The wide gap between five-star reviews (many from first-time reviewers) and detailed, substantiated one-star accounts raises questions about review authenticity.

Praised for
  • great location and walkability
  • responsive and helpful leasing staff
  • spacious apartments
  • quick maintenance (when it occurs)
  • pool and amenities
Watch-outs
  • broken elevator and frequent downtime
  • negligent maintenance and long wait times
  • unclean move-in units
  • parking fees and guest charges
  • security deposit disputes and collections issues
  • mold and water damage
  • poor soundproofing and climate control
  • unresponsive management and lack of accountability
responsive-managementunresponsive-maintenanceparking-issuesclean-common-areaspest-problemswell-maintainedsafe-secureslow-maintenancefriendly-staffpoor-soundproofing
Best for: Young professionals prioritizing walkable location over maintenance responsiveness; those without upper-floor accessibility needs.
Think twice if: Elevator breakdowns, months-long maintenance delays, and undocumented deposit disputes are deal-breakers; guest parking charges are steep and enforced rigidly.

What this place gets right

  • prime South Congress location near restaurants and Barton Springs Trail
  • responsive individual leasing staff (Jamie, Nicholas, Levi named repeatedly)
  • pool and common amenities
  • spacious floor plans

Before you tour or apply

  • Elevator breaks down roughly every other week in upper floors
  • Move-in units arrive uncleaned with safety hazards (broken outlets, broken washing machines, cabinet hinges off hinges)
  • Maintenance uses sulfuric acid for drain clearing without warning (chemical spill on resident property documented)
  • Parking garage leaks orange liquid damaging resident car paint
  • Security deposit disputes escalated to collections without proper notice or communication
  • Staff members Jamie Greer, Nicholas, and Levi consistently named for helpfulness; new maintenance team as of April 2026
  • One resident received mold toxicity diagnosis within less than a year
  • Unhoused individuals documented in stairwells

Resident ratings

Luxury Apartments
Strong location and leasing experience undermined by unmaintained units, slow repairs, and unresponsive management.
Pet-Friendly Apartments
Welcomes pets with stated fees and monthly rent, but residents report chemical spills and uncontrolled unhoused populations in common areas posing safety risks to animals.

How it stacks up

  • Rated 4 against a 4.01 average across the 777 luxury apartments businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 89% of the businesses in this directory.

What keeps coming up

proximity to downtownleasing office staffquick maintenancesmooth transitionfront office staffnew apartmentresponsive staffleasing processspacious apartmentswelcoming atmosphere

How we scored this

How We Score
Star rating 33
Review volume 100
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 42
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Breaking down the ratings

5
207
4
17
3
5
2
8
1
61

FAQ

What are the pet fees and monthly costs?
One pet: $350 non-refundable fee, $250 deposit, $20 monthly rent. Two pets: $450 non-refundable fee, $250 per pet deposit, $20 per pet monthly rent.
How much do residents pay for parking?
Residents pay $75-80 per month per vehicle. Guests pay $25 minimum for two hours, $57 for a full day.
How long does maintenance typically take?
Multiple residents report requests taking over a month to be addressed, though one reviewer praised the current maintenance team as quick and responsive.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

The Lola
73

The Lola

4.0(234)✓ Google-verified

Strong staff warmth and location draw most residents, with praise for upkeep and recent renovations. But a vocal minority flag aggressive fee stacking, package theft, thin walls, and landscaping noise at early hours-concerns that clash with the "luxury" positioning and high rent.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Timbercreek Apartments
68

Timbercreek Apartments

4.0(243)✓ Google-verified

Timbercreek delivers on location and community for many residents, with staff like Mindy, Hector, and Felipe earning specific praise for going above and beyond during move-in and repairs. The complex sits in a tree-lined creek setting near downtown views and offers fitness facilities, dog areas, and responsive maintenance when it works. However, a vocal minority faces serious concerns: mold has lingered unresolved for months, pest control requests sit ignored or incomplete, and management sometimes dismisses residents seeking help or rental assistance. The building's age and foundation problems seem to breed recurring pest issues that overwhelm the property's otherwise appealing bones. Recent management changes have sharpened tensions. Several long-term residents describe the new team as unresponsive and clueless, pointing to poor communication around major work (tree removal without notice) and dismissive attitudes when residents raise safety issues. For those who land in a clean unit with responsive staff, Timbercreek feels like home; for others fighting mold or vermin, it has become a financial and emotional strain.

Luxury Apartments
422 at the Lake
63

422 at the Lake

3.7(187)✓ Google-verified

422 at the Lake holds a 3.7 rating across 187 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Luxury Apartments

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-09-08