Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
Forest Creek Village Apartments logo

Forest Creek Village Apartments

Updated 2026-09-22 · 3,787 reviewed · 924 listed · Scored from 66 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.1(66) 55 composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Luxury Apartments
Forest Creek Village Apartments
Location
Greater South River City, Austin
Service
Luxury Apartments
Reviews
66
Best for
Budget-conscious renters comfortable with older units and seeking friendly staff; short-term occupants who avoid maintenance-intensive issues.

Core details are sourced from this business's Google Business Profile (checked 2026-09-22). Website-sourced details were fetched 2026-07-21.

What we found

Staff warmth masks serious infrastructure problems. Multiple residents report sewage leaks, mold, and pests; the city found structural issues. Leasing teams (Felicia, Rhonda, Susan) shine during move-in, and newer residents praise value and friendliness. Older residents and repeat occupants describe the complex deteriorating: inflated water charges, rats, duct-tape repairs, and billing sent to collections despite proof of payment. The complex carries 37 documented code violations.

Praised for
  • friendly, helpful leasing staff (Felicia, Rhonda, Susan)
  • smooth move-in process
  • affordable pricing
  • well-maintained older units
  • efficient maintenance crew
  • quiet, friendly community
Watch-outs
  • sewage leaks, mold, structural safety issues (37 code violations as of 2025)
  • pest problems (rats, cockroaches)
  • high unexplained water bills
  • inconsistent rule enforcement vs. property upkeep
  • billing errors and collection agency disputes
  • slow or inadequate repairs
friendly-staffpest-problemsunresponsive-maintenancewell-maintainedgood-value
Best for: Budget-conscious renters comfortable with older units and seeking friendly staff; short-term occupants who avoid maintenance-intensive issues.
Think twice if: History of sewage, mold, pest infestations, code violations, and billing disputes. Water charges may be inflated. Long-term residents report deterioration and collection-agency disputes over disputed amounts.

What this place gets right

  • Responsive, personable leasing staff
  • Affordable compared to newer Austin complexes
  • Quick, efficient maintenance crew (when engaged)
  • Quiet, established community feel

Before you tour or apply

  • Leasing staff: Felicia, Rhonda, Susan praised for professionalism during tours and move-in
  • Austin City identified structural safety issues; Austin Tenants Council logged 37 code violations (2025)
  • Maintenance staff noted as efficient and friendly but slow on pest control (rats, cockroaches)
  • Resident reported raw sewage leak from upstairs, black mold, loss of utilities; another reported ceiling collapse from sewage
  • Arbitrary water-bill allocation across complex (including pool, grounds) charged to tenants
  • Billing errors reported: duplicate line items, disputed paid amounts sent to collections, then sent again after second payment

Resident ratings

Luxury Apartments
Marketed as luxury but serves older, deteriorating units with infrastructure faults; newer residents rate move-in and staff highly; long-term residents report decline

How it stacks up

  • Rated 3.1 against a 4.01 average across the 780 luxury apartments businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 27% of the businesses in this directory.

What keeps coming up

friendly residentsmoldaffordabilityhelpful staffunresponsive managementmove in processquiet communitylovely staffgreenerypest control

How we scored this

How We Score
Star rating 0
Review volume 79
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 48
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Breaking down the ratings

5
29
4
6
3
2
2
2
1
27

FAQ

What made the move-in process smooth?
Leasing staff (Felicia, Rhonda, Susan) guided residents through applications, tours, and paperwork with patience and clarity; many residents said the process was well organized and stress-free.
Why are water bills so high?
The complex divides total water consumption across all units; charges include pool, lawn care, and common areas residents don't directly use. Residents report bills around $200/month despite no washer/dryer in units.
What maintenance issues have been reported?
Sewage leaks (raw sewage from upstairs units), mold, rats, cockroaches, and slow repairs. The city cited structural safety violations; the Austin Tenants Council documented 37 code violations as of 2025.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

Montecito Apartments
58

Montecito Apartments

3.3(144)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise the leasing agent Kameron and maintenance team Matt for quick responses, noting the quiet neighborhood feel and well-kept amenities draw repeat residents. Yet deposit disputes over cleaning charges and serious complaints about water damage, roaches, and unresponsive management over months reveal cracks: some residents faced collection agency action after early lease exits, and one caller reported the office ignored their phone calls entirely. The 3.3-star rating reflects this split. Most who stay long-term renew; those who faced emergencies or damage disputes leave angry. Montecito seems to hinge on whether your lease stays smooth or you need help fast.

Luxury Apartments
The Heights on Congress
55

The Heights on Congress

3.7(49)✓ Google-verified

Multiple residents report serious security breaches (break-ins, assault, lock-change refusals) alongside years-long maintenance failures (pool closure, roach infestation, plumbing). While staff like Karla earned praise for responsiveness when directly engaged, safety complaints and unmet maintenance needs vastly outweigh positive feedback. The property's 3.7 rating reflects sharp division: 49% five-star ratings cluster at the older, shorter reviews, while 29% one/two-star reviews from recent months document escalating security and upkeep concerns.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Hillside Creek
59

Hillside Creek

3.4(181)✓ Google-verified

Hillside Creek pulls hard in two directions. Residents who connect with the maintenance crew-especially Mandi, Manny, and Emmanuel-experience quick repairs, emergency help, and genuine professionalism. Others arrive to mold, roaches, and broken fixtures, then watch plumbing and utilities fail while management stays distant. Security is fractured: some feel safe, others report three car break-ins, theft from communal spaces, and surprise towing. The most damaging complaint: management sent accounts to collections without warning or contact, leaving residents unable to dispute or resolve charges. Spacious units and location draw residents; poor building maintenance and inconsistent service tear them away. Pet owners have access to a dog park, but reviews do not speak to the quality of that amenity or how the complex handles pet policies overall.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-09-22