Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
Wildwood Apartments logo

Wildwood Apartments

Updated 2026-09-22 · 3,787 reviewed · 924 listed · Scored from 428 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.9(428) 66 composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Wildwood Apartments
Location
St. Johns, Austin
Services
Luxury Apartments, Pet-Friendly Apartments
Reviews
428
Best for
Pet owners looking for accessible, staff-responsive leasing experience.

Core details are sourced from this business's Google Business Profile (checked 2026-09-22). Website-sourced details were fetched 2026-07-28.

What we found

Staff at the leasing office earn consistent five-star praise for their attentiveness and problem-solving, especially Jareny, Valentina, Jocelyn, and Yoselin. Residents report quick fixes when issues arise and a welcoming move-in experience.

However, the property struggles with hidden fees (trash, pool maintenance, parking charges), trash overflow in common areas, and delayed maintenance response. One resident described the complex as overcrowded with 10+ people per unit and reported safety concerns. The 3.9 rating reflects sharp division: 69% five-star reviews focus on staff, while 26% one/two-star reviews cite property conditions and billing practices.

Praised for
  • responsive leasing staff
  • quick issue resolution
  • pet-friendly
  • welcoming atmosphere
Watch-outs
  • hidden fees and charges
  • trash overflow and poor maintenance
  • overcrowding and parking shortage
  • maintenance responsiveness lag
responsive-managementfriendly-staffunresponsive-maintenanceoverpriced
Best for: Pet owners looking for accessible, staff-responsive leasing experience.
Think twice if: You need reliable maintenance response or value transparent pricing; residents report significant hidden fees and maintenance delays.

What this place gets right

  • Experienced leasing staff responsive to tenant questions
  • Pet-friendly policy
  • Quick issue resolution from office
  • Swimming pool and business center on-site

Before you tour or apply

  • Staff members named include Jareny, Valentina, Jocelyn, and Yoselin, all praised for leasing support
  • One resident reported trash fees, pool maintenance charges, and $55 monthly parking fees in addition to base rent
  • Maintenance responsiveness cited as weak point; contrast with leasing office strength
  • Pool described by one reviewer as unmaintained (empty concrete slab)

Resident ratings

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Residents confirm pet-friendly policy; no complaints about pet restrictions or fees mentioned in reviews.
Luxury Apartments
Marketing claims upscale positioning, but reviews cite overcrowding, maintenance gaps, and hidden fees that undercut luxury positioning.

How it stacks up

  • Rated 3.9 against a 4.01 average across the 780 luxury apartments businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 97% of the businesses in this directory.

What keeps coming up

helpful staffclear property management teamclean propertyleasing office staffpest controlfireplacelease renewalmoldpoolscleanliness

How we scored this

How We Score
Star rating 27
Review volume 100
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 48
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Breaking down the ratings

5
296
4
13
3
8
2
12
1
99

FAQ

Are there additional fees beyond rent?
Yes. Residents report trash fees, pool maintenance charges, and optional parking fees ($55/month). One reviewer estimated total monthly cost around $1,200 for an $850 base rent unit.
How quickly does maintenance respond?
Mixed. Leasing office resolves administrative issues quickly, but one resident gave a 4-star review specifically noting "the maintenance part wasn't great" and "they should pay more attention to that area."
Are pets allowed?
Yes. The complex lists pet-friendly housing and welcomes pets, though no pet deposit or monthly pet fees are specified in available information.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

The Vue
62

The Vue

3.7(177)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Laura and Julian earn consistent praise for professionalism and knowledge during tours, and recent residents love the modern layouts, in-unit washers, and amenities. However, a year-round pattern of unaddressed maintenance failures, roach infestations, non-functional AC and pool, and unresponsive office staff dominates later complaints, creating a stark divide between what the leasing team promises and what residents experience after move-in. The property struggles with basic upkeep: pest control rarely arrives despite payment, bathrooms peel, appliances misfunction within days, and management either ignores requests or sends unprepared technicians. Several residents report extreme frustration with locked-out units and debt collection tactics that contradict the welcoming tours.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Heights at the Cameron
61

Heights at the Cameron

4.0(40)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff Claudia and Yunier stand out for patience with applicants facing credit challenges or homelessness. Recent reviews highlight fast maintenance under Leticia. However, older complaints detail pest problems, three-month maintenance delays, and difficulty reaching management by phone. The property appears to have changed hands or improved leadership.

Luxury Apartments
Vue at the Cameron
51

Vue at the Cameron

3.5(33)✓ Google-verified

Vue at the Cameron struggles with fundamental maintenance failures and livability issues that drive rapid resident turnover. Multiple reviewers report broken appliances at move-in, inadequate repairs, pest problems, and unsafe conditions including transient activity on premises. While one recent reviewer noted quiet surroundings, the overwhelming pattern of one and two-star ratings reflects serious concerns about property upkeep, management responsiveness, and basic habitability that far outweigh isolated positive mentions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-09-22