Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
San Paloma Apartments logo

San Paloma Apartments

Updated 2026-09-22 · 3,787 reviewed · 924 listed · Scored from 235 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.4(235) 56 composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Townhome & Garden-Style Communities
San Paloma Apartments
Location
Crossing At Parmer Lane, Austin
Service
Townhome & Garden-Style Communities
Reviews
235
Best for
Residents prioritizing quick maintenance turnaround and friendly staff interaction.

Core details are sourced from this business's Google Business Profile (checked 2026-09-22). Website-sourced details were fetched 2026-07-24.

What we found

San Paloma has a loyal base of residents who praise the maintenance team's speed and the friendliness of office staff like Tuta, Mackensy, and Dulce; however, persistent complaints about cockroaches, gate security failures, and vehicle theft dominate recent reviews. Management is praised when residents get service requests through, but criticized for inattention to safety issues and for appearing to delete negative feedback rather than address problems.

Praised for
  • responsive maintenance staff
  • friendly office staff
  • clean common areas
  • pool maintenance
Watch-outs
  • severe cockroach infestation
  • vehicle theft and vandalism
  • unresponsive management on safety
  • excessive fees and billing disputes
  • mold and maintenance issues
poor-communicationpest-problemspackage-theftfriendly-staff
Best for: Residents prioritizing quick maintenance turnaround and friendly staff interaction.
Think twice if: Pest control issues, vehicle security, and management responsiveness to safety complaints are serious concerns for you.

What this place gets right

  • rapid maintenance response (same day to 24 hours)
  • engaged office staff by name
  • maintained pool and common areas
  • on-site services and garage options

Before you tour or apply

  • Named staff praised: Tuta, Mackensy, Dulce at service desk and leasing office
  • Maintenance claims same-day or 24-hour service completion
  • Recurring cockroach infestations despite pest control visits
  • Gate failures reported; CCTV present but tire theft and vehicle vandalism repeated
  • Billing disputes and deposit retention complaints mentioned
  • Mold and water damage issues in some units
  • Review deletion by management reported by residents

Resident ratings

Townhome & Garden-Style Communities
Mixed: praised for responsive maintenance and clean grounds, but safety and pest control failures undermine the gated community promise.

How it stacks up

  • Rated 3.4 against a 4.07 average across the 252 townhome & garden-style communities businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 79% of the businesses in this directory.

What keeps coming up

poolgated communityapartment sizeaffordabilitygympest controla/cgroundsnoisefee

How we scored this

How We Score
Star rating 0
Review volume 100
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 34
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Breaking down the ratings

5
105
4
34
3
17
2
9
1
70

FAQ

How fast does maintenance respond to repair requests?
Reviewers report most requests are completed the same day or within 24 hours.
Is the gated community secure?
No. Multiple reviewers report tire theft and vehicle vandalism despite gated access and CCTV; gates are described as frequently broken and left open.
What is the pest control situation?
Severe cockroach infestations are the dominant complaint; pest control visits occur but infestations return, and dirty carpets were noted at move-in.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

Villas Tech Ridge
61

Villas Tech Ridge

3.7(355)✓ Google-verified

The community has a strong maintenance crew when functioning well, and leasing staff earn individual praise. However, recent years show escalating problems: slow emergency response to AC failures, amenities down for months, and mounting resident frustration over opaque renewal pricing that doesn't match advertised rates. Move-out charges for pre-existing damage, lax security (gate often nonfunctional), homeless individuals on the property, and management dismissiveness push many residents to leave despite years of tenure.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Oaks at Techridge
71

The Oaks at Techridge

4.0(226)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the clean, green spaces and staff responsiveness, with repeat mentions of Shielyn (Assistant Community Manager) making leasing and move-in stand out. Maintenance responds quickly, amenities are well-kept, and the neighborhood feels safe and convenient for three-year residents. However, consistent complaints surface around pest control delays and infestation, overnight commercial truck noise facing the street, and unexplained rent hikes month-to-month. Security gaps (no cameras, theft incidents) and occasional staff rudeness undercut the otherwise positive experience.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 Housing
Lakewood Apartments
65

Lakewood Apartments

3.8(269)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise staff friendliness and attractive amenities, but maintenance issues plague the community. Reviewers report broken appliances, non-functional dog park facilities, poorly maintained grounds littered with trash, vehicle theft from unmonitored parking, and slow response times. The gap between the polished appearance and actual upkeep drives away residents who stay less than two years.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-09-22